<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Confusion Art &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusionart.com/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusionart.com</link>
	<description>Synchronizing My Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Field of View</title>
		<link>http://confusionart.com/2010/10/field-of-view/</link>
		<comments>http://confusionart.com/2010/10/field-of-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusionart.com/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I was thinking about how does the focal length of a lens actually manifest itself to how much is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">So I was thinking about how does the focal length of a lens actually manifest itself to how much is my camera able to &#8216;see&#8217;. For example, if I have a 50mm lens, and I replace it with a 85mm, how much more/less is the camera able to capture. One measure of this is the &#8216;Field of view&#8217; (FOV) or &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_view">Angle of View</a>&#8216;. Now given that the camera sensor is not square, the FOV in horizontal and vertical direction will be different. Without any reason to choose one, I focus on the horizontal FOV.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Shown below is the horizontal FOV (in degrees) as it changes with the focal length of the lens. The blue curve shows the FOV for a full frame camera (36mm wide sensor) and the red for a 1.6 crop factor camera (22.5mm sensor width). I have a Canon 30D which has 22.5mm sensor. So, a 50mm lens gives me a 25° horizontal FOV. Buying a 85mm lens would decrease that to about 15°. Although still not very intuitive, these numbers do give me something to visualize.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/fov.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-539" title="fov" src="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/fov-300x251.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="251" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://confusionart.com/2010/10/field-of-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More modifications on my photoblog</title>
		<link>http://confusionart.com/2007/10/more-modifications-on-my-photoblog/</link>
		<comments>http://confusionart.com/2007/10/more-modifications-on-my-photoblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mylife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusionart.com/blog/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally after months of wait, I can say that my photoblog is ready for launch. I know that I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally after months of wait, I can say that my photoblog is ready for launch. I know that I have been publicizing it from few months, but this is the first time that it feels complete.  If you have seen the site in past week, <a href="http://confusionart.com/photoblog">go now</a> and you will notice some changes.</p>
<p>1. The first major change is the <a href="http://confusionart.com/photoblog/index.php?x=comments" title="http://confusionart.com/photoblog/index.php?x=comments" target="_blank">recent comments</a>  tab, where all the top recent comments (top == 50) are documented. It should solve two problems &#8211; one, allow me to see who has posted on  the pictures, and two, allow you to see if I/anyone else has replied to your comments. This will help in better communication, and help me to further improve with your useful comments.</p>
<p>2. The second one is the about page, where I have made a weak attempt to explain the relation of photography to me. I plan to update it as time passes, as I am more clear myself about what it means to me, nonetheless, its good enough to remove the under construction tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://confusionart.com/2007/10/more-modifications-on-my-photoblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this front focus</title>
		<link>http://confusionart.com/2007/09/is-this-front-focus/</link>
		<comments>http://confusionart.com/2007/09/is-this-front-focus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusionart.com/blog/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I earlier had the problem of front focus on my camera, after getting it repaired, I tried a few focus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I earlier had the problem of front focus on my camera, after getting it repaired, I tried a few focus test. I get mixed results on this, so anyone with more experience claim about the focus issues here?<a href="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cut1.jpg" title="100% crop 1"> </a></p>
<p><strong>Test 1</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cut1.jpg" title="100% crop 1"><img src="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cut1.jpg" alt="100% crop 1" /></a></p>
<p>This is the test chart from <a href="http://www.focustestchart.com/chart.html" target="_blank">http://www.focustestchart.com/chart.htm</a>. Here I feel that none of the lines are properly in focus. The pink box shows where I tried to focus. Is this because of low light condition.</p>
<p>ExposureTime &#8211; 1/200 seconds<br />
FNumber &#8211; 1.80<br />
ExposureProgram &#8211; Aperture priority<br />
ISOSpeedRatings &#8211; 400</p>
<p><strong>Test 2</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cut2.jpg" title="100% crop 2"><img src="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cut2.jpg" alt="100% crop 2" /></a></p>
<p>In this second test I just cranked up a Corel vector graphic and tried to focus on the monitor screen. This looks good to me and in focus.</p>
<p>ExposureTime &#8211; 1/25 seconds<br />
FNumber &#8211; 1.80<br />
ExposureProgram &#8211; Aperture priority<br />
ISOSpeedRatings &#8211; 100</p>
<p><strong>Test 3 (Worst)</strong><br />
<a href="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cut31.jpg" title="100% crop 3"><img src="http://confusionart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cut31.jpg" alt="100% crop 3" /></a></p>
<p>This last test blows me away, I try to focus on the corner and this shows a heavy front focus. Is this because of low light? Is this because the actual area where the camera focus from is slightly shifted? I just used the center AF point for all the three tests.</p>
<p>ExposureTime &#8211; 1/15 seconds<br />
FNumber &#8211; 1.80<br />
ExposureProgram &#8211; Aperture priority<br />
ISOSpeedRatings &#8211; 100</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://confusionart.com/2007/09/is-this-front-focus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

